[info]wraithtdk

The Original Wraith Blog

It's like my other micro blogs. Only...not quite so micro.


WWE: Either unify titles or re-split the brands!
[info]wraithtdk

First, some (storyline/kayfabe) history.

Once upon a time, Monday Night Raw and Friday Night Smackdown featured a shared pool of Superstars and championship titles. This continued until WWE (then WWF) bought out WCW. Shortly after that, they featured the “invasion” storyline, in which Shane McMahon had purchased WCW, and Stephanie McMahon had bought out ECW, and the two of them used their new acquisitions to launch a takeover of the WWE. This made for some interesting sub-plots, but it was generally handled rather poorly. Sting has named this period as the reason he never went to WWE. He objected to the way they squashed Booker T, who had clawed and scrapped his way up the ladder to be the last WCW champion; and Sting, ever the WCW Franchise player, took exception to what he rightfully saw as disrespect to his former brand.

                One of the more obvious problems with this period was how many titles were running around. There was the WWF & WCW World Heavyweight Title, the United States Title, the Intercontinental Title, The European Title, the Cruiserweight Title, the light heavyweight title, the WCW & WWF Tag Titles, and the WWF & WCW Hardcore titles. If you didn’t have a belt at this point, you probably kind of sucked. Eventually the solved this problem by unifying the WWF titles with their WCW equivalents.

                After the invasion, Rick Flair returned to the WWF. Apparently, Stephanie and Shane got the money to buy the other Wrestling brand by selling their WWF shares to Rick Flair, who now owned 50% of the WWF. Rick and Vince started feuding, which became extremely disruptive. To settle their issues, the WWF board of directors created a brand extension. Rick Flair got control of Monday Night Raw and Vince McMahon got control of Friday Night Smackdown. They held a draft wherein the talent pool was split up between the two shows, with the champions being allowed to compete on either (much like the Divas champ & Tag Team champs can now) brand. Eventually, the “undisputed World Title” (you know, the one that Jericho still brags about being the first man to hold?) was split as a result of Brock Lesnar signing an exclusive Smackdown contract. RAW got the WWE championship, and Smackdown got the World Heavyweight title. The rest of the belts soon followed.

                This continued for years, until the end of last year, when Triple H took over Vince McMahon’s job (Vince was finally deposed by the board of directors for making decisions that hurt the company, namely his decision to fire Cena). HHH’s first decision was to create the “RAW Supershow” (an incredibly stupid name for a regularly occurring show), which featured Raw and Smackdown superstars. Shortly thereafter, RAW superstars began to bleed over into Smackdown as well. The end result is that you now have the same mess we had during the invasion: too many titles. When every superstar can compete for the WWE or WH Title, they start to lose some of their impact. It made sense when the brands were separate, the WWE Title was the top belt for RAW and the WH title was the brass ring of Smackdown. Now, there’s no clear “top guy” on either show.

          Personally, I liked the separation. If it were up to me, I’d call for a new draft, re-separate the shows, and even re-split the tag and women’s titles. RAW would get the WWE, Intercontinental, Divas and WWE Tag titles. Smackdown would get the World Heavyweight, Cruiserweight, United states, World Tag Team and Women’s championships (this could give Smackdown a unique feeling by creating actual divisions that the talent would be resigned to, instead of SD simply being “RAW lite” as it has been for so long).

          If this can’t be done, then the titles need to be re-unified. World Heavyweight Championship, United States Championship (because it just makes more sense than World Champ/Intercontinental Champ; doesn’t a title that spans all continent make it a world title?), World Tag Team championship, Women’s championship. Drop “Super Show” from RAW and just acknowledge that you’ve gone back to the old school two shows a week format (not counting NXT, because apparently WWE doesn’t want to. More on that some other time).

Tags: , , ,

On the apparent increase of atheism-based hostility...
[info]wraithtdk
It seems like it's becoming increasingly difficult to meet an atheist that doesn't have a massive ego and doesn't think it's acceptable to shit on people for their faith. Right now I can think of two that I know personally that don't, out of twenty-four I've talked to in the past week (perhaps more, I could only remember two dozen). Atheists make up about 5% of the people in the world and about 90% of the "why belief group X is fucked up" posts/cartoons/pictures/videos that cross my screen.

The thing is, they're typically quick to point out that atheism isn't a religion; that religion is a system of beliefs, and *lack* of belief in something doesn't constitute *belief* in anything. And I get that. Yet the attitude amongst atheists that I encounter seems to be as uniform (or more so) than that of the followers of any religion I can think of. It's as if they HAVE formed a religion based around the belief that anyone who believes in God - or for that matter anything that they can't fully understand or prove to be true - is undeserving of basic respect. It also occurs to me that while a lack of belief in God may not be the the cause of such a shitty mindset in so many, it certainly seems to be a common symptom of it.

Perhaps the most infuriating thing about this phenomenon is that what brought on this whole rant is that in the past few weeks, it seems like my various feeds have been regularly assaulted with snarky cartoons (I'm looking at you, Oatmeal ) and comments implying (or flat out saying) that religion is some kind of aggression/hostility causing cancer on the world; yet they seem to believe that the same attitudes that they rail on the religious for displaying is perfectly acceptable if you declare yourself "non-religious."



MY response to "I'm Christian, unless you're gay."
[info]wraithtdk
Ugh. I thought I was done with this stupid article; but apparently, the responses to it are drawing as much attention as the article itself. So, I thought perhaps it's time I shared MY response to it. Actually, I did, back when it was written, in the comments section. But now it's showing up in my social network feed again; so rather than ranting in response to everyone who posted it, I'm just going to write my response here. The article in question is titled "I'm Christian, Unless You're Gay." Long story short, have you ever heard someone spew racist garbage and then say "not that I hate them or anything, really, some of my best friends are black?" Welcome to the religious equivalent. My response:


A+ for effort, but ultimately, this guy seems as cluelessly judgmental as the people he talks smack about.
why is it that sometimes the most “Christlike” people are they who have no religion at all?”

Probably because you don’t know as much about Christ or those who follow him as you think you do, and the people like the WBC stand out in your mind because they are the rare exception to the norm; and BECAUSE they so stand out, they’re the first example you think of when you think of Christians.
What pisses me off is that this guy pretty much lays out the evidence pointing to one thing, but seems unable to use simple conclusive reasoning: he claims that he sees the same hatred for those “different” from every religion. From Jews, Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, whatever. Let me ask you something: can you look me in the eye and tell me honestly that you don’t think that you could go to the area that he lives in and hear the same hateful sentiments from completely non-religious people? Of course you could. Why do you think that is? Because it’s not Christianity. It’s not religion. Deductive reasoning: Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist; non-religious, what’s the common thread?

Humanity.

It’s human nature. Not a good part. Not a part to be proud of. But a part. Humanity has a lot of very bad, very base instincts ingrained into them. We have a natural inclination to hate that which we fear, to fear that which we distrust and to distrust that which we do not understand. And the truth is, I don’t believe that we’re really getting any better at it. I think that the vast majority of us still instinctively distrust what we don’t understand.

“But Wraith, I don’t have a problem with gays or people who are different than me!” Well, good for you. The mistake that most people make is assuming this is because we’re getting better at trusting what we don’t understand. I don’t believe this is the case. I believe that we are simply getting better at understanding things. Don’t believe me? Consider the claims made by your typical bigot. Usually, it’s just a slur of stereotypes and commonly spread misconceptions. And they speak these things with such conviction! Know why? Because, while they may be incorrect, they’re not lying. They truly believe the things they are saying. Because they don’t really understand the people they’re talking about. And that’s why they hate.

It’s most likely a survival instinct handed down from our caveman ancestors. It’s our nature. The reason we’re not all hateful bigots is that humanity, more than any other species on the planet, has the ability to reason, and in doing so, to rise above our base nature.

Also, in a LOT of cases, this statement:
No, what makes somebody love, accept, and befriend their fellow man is letting go of a need to be better than others.”
Is the exact opposite of true. A lot of people are “open and accepting” BECAUSE they need to feel that they are better than others. And in modern, western culture, open-minded=enlightened; thus they make a big show about how completely open and accepting they are. They have a collection of assorted cause ribbons and awareness event name tags, each of which, ultimately amounts to little more than “I’m better than you points.” Ever notice that walkathons and rallies designed to raise “awareness” of things that I don’t know ANYONE who is not aware of will draw thousands of people, but soup kitchens still end up under-staffed? Walkathons and rallies let people wear ribbons and be publicly seen being “enlightened,” while feeding the homeless or toiling in humble obscurity to care for the outcast, well, who would want to do that? I mean, you know, besides all those horrible church-folk. Who do it every day in out-reach shelters and missions across the world.

Bottom line: humanity, by default, is selfish and distrustful of what we do not understand. This is not our religion, it is our nature. He is correct that it must stop; that we can and must rise above it; but my advice to him is that if he wants to convince people to read a three page essay and look positively upon it, don’t spend the first page and a half or so talking about “the trouble with religious folk.” We get enough of that already (yea man, keep lumping me in with the WBC because I’m a Christan. Maybe you’d like to get mad at me for being black like the guy that mugged your cousin, too?). What he’s done is basically like spending a page and a half talking about bad things that minorities do, and then try to calm people down by going “but really, some of my best friend are black! And I’ve known some real jerks who were white, too. But man, minorities…”


Tags:
  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories

"The War On Women"
[info]wraithtdk
I have been attempting to scale myself back for the past few days. Honestly, I have. I realize I'm starting to alienate the people I care about with the amount of anger and frustration I display towards things I see as stupid and unreasonable. And while I contend that the only difference between my feed and most of my friend's feeds is that the things pissing me off are the "cause of the week" that a lot of you care about; I care bout you guys (those of you on my friends list, not those of you who are just following me or found me by accident. I hate you guys. -kidding), and it's clear that my venting isn't really helping anything. Arguing doesn't make me feel all that much better, and the truth is that people seem to have lost the ability to look at anything objectively to see my points no matter how I frame them, or how much logic I apply.

All that being said, I have to say *something* about this; but I will try to be a general and non-hostile as I can:


Some of you guys need to calm down with the "Zomg everyone hates and oppresses women" stuff. I keep seeing headlines about "The War Against Women" or "group X/candidate X/company X hates women!"

Guys, seriously, none of these people "hate women." They're not "at war with women" and they're not "against health care for women." Things you seem to not understand:

1. Conservatives - including conservative women - generally tend to believe that human life begins at a much earlier point that most of you do. That's why they're pro-life. It's not because they hate women. It's not because they think they have a right to tell you what to do with your bodies, it's because they believe that what's inside you, almost from the instant of conception, is a life.

Now I'm not interested in debating the merits of this belief with you. This post is not about pro-life vs. pro-choice. That is way too big of a can of worms to get into right now, and I’ll tell you ahead of time, any comments about why this belief is wrong OR right will get deleted. I’m serious.

What this is about is the fact that whether you agree with their belief or not, you need to understand and accept that this is their belief. Believing what’s growing inside of you is a baby doesn’t mean you “hate women.” And no, it doesn’t mean that pro-lifers believe they have a right to tell you what to do with your body. It means that, right or wrong, they believe that abortion is the act of destroying your child’s body. That’s what they believe.

2. Planned Parenthood, amongst other things, is huge proponent of women’s right to have an abortion. Now, keeping in mind that pro-lifers consider unborn children to be human life, as sacred as newborns, an organization that is so active to assist women in destroying unborn children is absolutely abhorrent. This is where the hatred for that organization stems. It has nothing to do with “not believe that women deserve health care.” That’s absurd, and I think that anyone with an ounce of objective thinking knows that. Do you really, honestly believe that there’s a boardroom somewhere with a bunch of one-dimensional, cartoon villains smoking cigars planning the downfall of women? Really, where is the motivation in that?

-------------------------------------------------------------------
The bottom line here is I don’t care if you want to agree with the folks on the other side of the political fence or not, but you are driving me freaking crazy with your total inability (or perhaps flat-out refusal) to even understand the beliefs and motivations of the other side. Half the stuff you’re sharing is framed and worded in such an extreme way that it amounts to flat-out propaganda. All I’m asking is this: from now on, when you read one of these stories, before you flip out and hit re-share in a fait of righteous, oppressed rage; take a deep breath, and ask yourself: “why are they doing/saying this? What is their motivation? Is it possible that the reason this story is so unbelievable is that there’s another angle to it that’s not being mentioned?”



...and I hate automobiles right back.
[info]wraithtdk

 Well that was fun. As I said in my last post, my Taurus shakes when it gets to 65-70mph. The wisdom of teh internets said that it’s most likely that the tires need balancing, or a belt is broken on a tire. Meineke does this for $30.00. For $50.00, you can get a premium oil change that includes the balancing, inflation, oil change and top off of all fluids; so I went with that. They did the oil change, which also includes a 20 point courtesy check; which I knew would mean that they’re gonna look at me and tell me about alllll the things wrong with my car. As per usual, I got the “did you know these are snapped? Did you know this is broken? Did you know you’re leaking…EVERYTHING?” the guy said “we make our living fixing cars, but I’d be a real bastard if I didn’t tell you it’s time to just replace that thing.” Sage advice, car guy. Wanna give me five grand? No? Then balance the tires and give me my key. Thanks. So I get my key and I take the car on the interstate to test it at speed. Well, I get to about 48mph and it starts shaking. And not just shaking, it feels like it’s about to fall apart. Great. So I took the car back and explained that it’s worse now than when I brought it in. The guy gave me a look that I recognized as the “did you just tell me that your computer with an eight year old copy of McAfee got a virus?” Look. I explained that I understood going in that there was no guarantee it would stop shaking and that yes, I do understand that the car is screwed up beyond all belief. The question is why is it now worse than it was just a few hours before I brought it in? The guy explained that since they did a tire rotation, the tires with less wear are on the front, so that probably made it shake worse. So I asked if they could please just re-rotate them so that I can at least drive the thing at 60mph and get to and from work. “Sure. We can do another rotation, but that’ll be $19.00.”

Wonderful. So I now owe Bank of America an extra seventy bucks, I skipped lunch, and my car is running exactly the same as it was before. But hey, at least I have clean oil, right? >:-X 


Automobiles hate me.
[info]wraithtdk
I’ve come to the conclusion that assorted automobiles hate me. I have never in my life owned a car that didn’t have something very noticeable wrong with it. Right now, me and my wife own three vehicle, all of which are a non-stop stream of issues. Behold: The Fail Garage:
  1. I own a red 2001 Ford Taurus. After spending months trying to fix my old Mercury Grand Marqee and ultimately giving up because they no longer made parts for it (thankfully I worked for Geeks On Call at the time and could drive the company car), I bought the Taurus from an Auto Auction. Soon after I had to replace the sparkplugs, wires and coil. After that, the starter died and had to be replaced. Then the battery. There was another engine part I can’t even remember.

     Then came the fumes. About a year and a half ago, the car started stinking whenever I turned on the air or heat. Slowly, I started developing a persistent cough. Eventually, the cough became chronic, and at my wife’s insistence, I went to see the doctors. Turns out there was massive congestion in my lungs. We started to explore reasons for it, and decided it could be the car, so we had that checked out. Turns out the engine was leaking from a couple of gaskets, and dripping down the hot engine, which was then filling the car with toxic fumes. So I had the gaskets fixed, paid the medical bills, and was thankful I wasn’t poisoned too badly. Unfortunately, the fumes didn’t’ stop, so I had to take it back in. They put dye in the system, and it turned out the engine was leaking from…well, pretty much everywhere. There’s no way to fix it; it’d cost a few grand, more than my car is worth. So I just resigned myself to drive in the winter without heat and the summer without AC.

     Recently, we took it to a shop to the get brakes done. Afterwards, the car started shaking really badly when I hit 60-70mph. We took it in and found that the transmission was barely still attached, and was pretty much about to fall out of my car. In addition, one of the ball joints was completely shot. We just got those fixed, but the damned thing is STILL shaking when I hit 60-70mph. I’ve been asking around, and people are telling me that more than likely it’s either a tire balance issue or a damaged belt. Meineke says it’s $39.00 for a tire balance; but I found a coupon for a $50.00 Supreme oil change, which includes the oil change, tire pressure check, tire rotation, fluid top-off (which is great, since everything is leaking) and a tire balance. The guy said he’ll check for a busted tire belt for free, as well; so I’m doing that on my lunch break.

     2. My father recently closed down his church, and after hearing my wife talk about how much she’s always wanted an astro van (I don’t get it, but whatever), he gave us the old church van. We were psyched to have two drivable vehicles for a time, but last weekend, it decided it wasn’t going to start at all. Just makes a clicking noise when I turn the key. Ultimately, I found out that when you turn the key, it drops sparks under it, so more than likely there’s a shorted wire in there somewhere. We’ve got a friend who’s a car guy that’s going to take a look.

     3. Then, of course, there’s my wife’s Jeep. I drove her jeep throughout the Snowmegeddon of 2010, and thankfully stayed quite warm, even if the broken seat (won’t move forward or back, leans to one side) did a number on my back. Just when spring hit, however, it decided to shake and stutter when it ran, so we had to shelve it. Took us nearly two years, but we’ve finally got it running again thanks to a lot of work from a very good friend. Not that it particularly matters because it’s still not street-legal because the amount of work you have to do to get a vehicle imported is ridiculous (my wife is Canadian and she drove the vehicle from there). As with the immigration process, just getting someone to freaking talk to you is a nightmare. The DMV is filled with rude idiots who insist they can’t help you unless you do things that are physical impossible, like bring in both the Canadian the title and registration for the vehicle, despite us telling them over and over again that in Canada, the two are one and the same. Ultimately we think we’ve got it figure out, but it’s taken my poor wife months of phone calls, research and stress, and it’s going to require several hours of driving to the nearest port of entry DMV, and a hunk of cash for registration, tax etc.

The most frustrating thing about all this is that I haven't had the money to pay for nearly any of this. If not for an extremely loving and supporting family, I would be screwed a thousand times over! I really hope that some time before I reach retirement age I can afford an actual new car.



Kony 2012: a fascinating chapter in Social Media & internet virals...
[info]wraithtdk
It's amazing how quickly tides turn on the internet. Sunday: most of the internet has never heard of Kony.

Monday: by the end of the day, everyone on the internet has either watched or been sent that Invisible Children video (which, for the record, was made NINE YEARS AGO).

Tuesday: OUTRAGE! Out come the Photoshop posters and the slogans and the Twitter campaigns!

Wednesday: RARRR! PROTEST! Hipsters & hippies (from here on out to be referred to as "Britas" who have grown bored with Occupy Wallstreet now that it's no longer in the news, start planning rallies and protests. Their goal: "Kony's a bad person." Wait, how is that a goal? "Well, he's like...a bastard, you know? And someone should do...something..." Such as? "He uses kids as army guys, you know?" I hate you.

Thursday: Kony goes...anti-viral? Within 24 hours, all record of "zomg Kony 2012" seems to have been replaced with an equally prolific stream of "zomg, did you know there's another side to some of this?!"



Can't wait to see what tomorrow brings.


Tags:
  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories

Kony 2012 update
[info]wraithtdk
Remember my last post about "Kony 2012"

Imagine that. Demanding we take out a warlord involves supporting violence and other unsavory things. Go figure.


On behalf of America: "you guys are new at this whole "go to another country and kill the bad guy that's pissing you off" thing, huh? n00bs."



Tags:

Kony 2012
[info]wraithtdk

RE: Kony
                I don’t get it. I mean, I get it, he’s an evil bastard that deserves to die. No question. But then, I have trouble saying that as I think it’s fair to say that I have a rather outspoken record of supporting the military, military action, and in general doing what needs to be done to eliminate evil on this planet.
                What I don’t get, is why there’s suddenly this huge movement to deal with this guy from the same people who typically call guys like me “small minded, hateful war-mongers.” You realize what it’d take to deal with this guy, right? We can’t just take a drive to his registered postal address, slap him in cuffs, read him is rights and then put him in prison. The guy’s a warlord. An international terrorist. To get to him, we’d have to through his men. And that would mean direct military action. And I love, love, love the fact that the same people who are constantly bitching that America is evil because “it sees itself as the world police” now say that we should fly to another part of the world and arrest him. You know, like the police do? And the people not calling for his arrest are saying we need to just kill him; which is funny, because a lot of those same people called us monsters for cheering the death of Binladden. What, so there IS a point at which desiring the death of a human being is warranted, but 3,000 human lives and two result wars weren’t quite enough?
                Seriously, I’m starting to get the feeling that what this comes down to is that Occupy Wallstreet isn’t in the news anymore, so people are getting bored, and they need some new cause to latch onto, and so they chose this guy; but just LIKE Occupy, they haven’t really put any thought into what the actually WANT. Do you guys really WANT military action taken? Because I get the feeling that if we do anything, you’re going to bitch about it. And if so, how about you rally for Canada take lead on this one? How about if someone else initiates the shit this time, so that we can be spared the “ugh, fucking world police, I’m moving to Canada” rants? Seriously, you guys know that the dude is already a wanted terrorist, right? We’ve sent a detachment of special forces to act as advisors already. So I’m a little lost: all these rallies, all these Youtube videos (I really gotta stop reading the comments under those; if you’re trying to send a message to people and you want to be taken seriously, stop abbreviating three letter words and run spell-check!), etc., what’s the goal here?


And now, for the sake of appeasement, and because I do have well-meaning friends who are involved in this, I present the "Kony 2012" video that's making the rounds  (Just an FYI, "Kony 2012" makes what you're doing sound like an election campaign, which more than likely is going to drive off everyone who's sick of dealing with politics; but whatever).




Tags:

Of boycotts and The RIAA
[info]wraithtdk
In a recent Torrent Freak article, a reader left a comment about boycotting the RIAA. While I agree that the RIAA are bastards and need a good swift kick to their wallet, it occurs to me that a boycott alone is a waste of time. Boycotts are good, but there is a second essential part of the process that must be followed, or a boycott is useless: the people boycotting must spread the word, both to the public and those they are boycotting, that they are boycotting and why.

The goal of a boycott should be to send a message. To let those being boycotted that what they're doing is not only unacceptable, it's going to cost them. The trouble is, if all you do is stop buying the RIAA's product, they're not going to look at the shrinking numbers and say "uh-oh, we better mend our ways!" They'r going to take those numbers, turn them around, and tell the public the low numbers are due entirely to piracy. That new album isn't under-selling because people are taking a stand, it's underselling because the pirate bay is giving it away for free. Not only is the effort then wasted, it actually backfires.
So if you want to boycott; by all means, do so. But my suggestion is this: buy an album, for full prices from a non-RIAA label, and then send a letter to an RIAA label saying

Dear Sir or Madam, please find attached a receipt for the album I recently bought. I would have gladly spent that money on your company's recent release [insert recent release tittle] had it not been for your recent actions [insert recent stunt]. When you get the sales for those numbers, I hope you'll remember that THIS lost sale had nothing to do with file sharing.

If they get a couple hundred thousand of those at the same time that an album bombs? That's how you send a message.

You are viewing [info]wraithtdk's journal